[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Lawrence D?Oliveiro <lawrencedo99 at gmail.com> writes: > The definition of ?random? is ?unknowable?. So all you are stating is > a tautology. What? No. You read a bunch of bits out of the device and you want to know whether they are Kolmogorov-random (you can look up what that means if you're not familiar with it). Quantum theory says they are, but if it is true, there is no scientific way to confirm it.

- Prev by Date:
**Fear and suspicion of lambdas, was Re: Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions** - Next by Date:
**Can math.atan2 return INF?** - Previous by thread:
**Can math.atan2 return INF?** - Next by thread:
**Can math.atan2 return INF?** - Index(es):