Can math.atan2 return INF?
On Thursday, June 30, 2016 at 6:57:41 PM UTC+12, Paul Rubin wrote:
>> Every time somebody tries to point to an example of a ?topic that is
>> beyond the reach of science?, it seems to get knocked over eventually.
> Generate a sequence of "random" bits from your favorite physical source
> (radioactive decay, quantum entanglement, or whatever). Is the sequence
> really algorithmically random (like in Kolmogorov randomness)? This is
> scientifically unknowable.
The definition of ?random? is ?unknowable?. So all you are stating is a tautology.