OT: This Swift thing
On 05/06/14 16:33, Michael Torrie wrote:
> In any case I'm a bit surprised by people comparing Python to Swift at
> all, implying that Python would have worked just as well and Apple
> should have chosen it to replace Objective C.
Because if you look at the spec, Swift is essentially a statically typed
Swift and Python will also be used in the same niche. C will still be
used for low-level stuff. Swift is not a replacement for C. It's a
replacement for Objective-C.
> Swift provides a cleaner system
> for developers to work in than Obj C did (which, by the way has
> reference counting), but carries on the same object model that
> developers are used to (and existing frameworks use).
That is what PyObjC does as well.