Checking network input processing by Python for a multi-threaded server
> Why not provide them so that anyone trying to analyze what you are
> seeing can try them for themselves.
I assume that an other information system can be more appropriate
for file distribution than this mailing list.
> Starting a full process takes time
This is usual. - Such an action would be necessary for the test case.
> Do you have ANY synchronization enabled,
I would expect that this is provided by the run time system for the
Python scripting language.
> so that you start all the children
The main process waits on the exit for the single started command
in each loop iteration.
> and they all wait for a single "go" signal to be set
> -- so that they all start processing at the same time?
I suggest to take another look at the description for the test algorithm.
> No idea what is in each loop...
An instance for the class ?threaded_TCP_server? and a call of ?subprocess.run(?)?.
> If there is only one list (implied by #1)
There are two lists adjusted.
1. Storage for received records before the statement ?server.shutdown()?
(and a reset to an empty list) is executed at the end of each loop iteration.
2. List lengths are recorded for analysis after the data collection phase.
> Again, it is not clear what is being counted here...
How many record sets were stored and are accessible at one point in time
in such a data structure?
> What is an "incidence", how is "available records" determined?
The generated table shows how often a specific number of record sets
was temporarily available for further data processing.
I would expect that the correct count should be 100 (once) here
(instead of the display of deviations from the original six test records).
> Also, TCP is a stream protocol, not a record protocol.
This view is generally fine.
JSON data structures are transmitted by the discussed approach.
> A client could use, say, 6 separate .send() operations,
This should be happening in this test.
> while the server receives everything in a single .recv() call.
I hope that the execution of the statement ?server.shutdown()? triggers
a separation in the reported inter-process communication.