Pylint false positives
Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Lexically, there is special access:
> class C:
> def __init__(self, some, arg):
> c = self
> class D:
> def method(self):
That's only because the definition of method() is lexically
inside the definition of __init__(). It has nothing to do
with nesting of the *class* statements.
Inner classes in Java have some special magic going on that
doesn't happen with nested classes in Python.
> the reason to use a class is that there is no handier way to create
> a method dispatch or a singleton object.
That's perfectly fine, but you can do that without creating
a new class every time you want an instance. You just have
to be *slightly* more explicit about the link between the
inner and outer instances.