[OT] Re: has sourceforge exposed the dirty little secret ?
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018, at 17:27, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > ? ?
> But here its broken and I am looking at two pairs of vertical boxes
> because it is not properly mime'd. If you use chars or gliphs from a
> non-default charset, it needs to demarcated with a mime-boundary marker
> followed by the new type definition. Your email/news agent did not do
UTF-8 is the default character set, and anyway his message does have a content-type of 'text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"'. Your environment not having font support and/or support for non-BMP characters is not a deficiency in the message.