[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

newb question about @property

Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On 9/30/17 5:47 PM, Bill wrote:
>> I spent a few hours experimenting with @property. To my mind it seems 
>> like it would be preferable to just define (override) instance 
>> methods __get__(), __set__(), and possibly __del__(), as desired, as 
>> I could easily provide them with "ideal" customization. Am I 
>> overlooking something?
> It would be easier to comment if you showed the two options. One with 
> @property, and one with __get__ etc.
> A downside to __get__ is that you need to create a class with those 
> methods, and then instantiate that class as an attribute in your real 
> class, whereas @property can be used without a lot of rigamarole.
> --Ned.

I am basically mimmicking what I see at (the very bottom of) this page: