Call by binding [was Re: [Tutor] beginning to code]
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 08:39 am, Gregory Ewing wrote:
> Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
>> "Binding" itself tends to be Python specific terminology -- in that it
"Binding" is certainly not Python-specific:
and here's an example of the term in use:
>> is the parameter /name/ that gets bound/attached to the argument /object/.
>> It is the same method as used in any Python "assignment" statement,
> Which is why I think "call by assignment" would be
> a much better term!
I think that suffers from the same problem as "call by binding" -- assignment is
too general a word.
The Pascal assignment:
a := b;
copies the value of b to the storage position represented by a. That's precisely
the same thing that occurs when you call func(b), so one might equally say that
Pascal was call by assignment. Likewise for C assignment.
Pascal doesn't have "reference variables", so there is no assignment analogue to
calling a function with a var parameter. But C++ does have reference variables,
to we can say that assignment:
a = b;
is the same as function call func(b) regardless of whether C++ is using by-value
or by-reference semantics.
So I believe that either "call by binding" or "call by assignment" could both
equally apply to any and all languages with function parameters, regardless of
implementation or the language's defined semantics.
?Cheer up,? they said, ?things could be worse.? So I cheered up, and sure
enough, things got worse.