[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Tutor] beginning to code

Stefan Ram wrote:
> Just as Python's ?string[::-1]? appears "obfuscated"
>    to readers who don't know Python.

I understand string[::-1] after only studying python for a day or two 
(I've only been studying it for 2 weeks at this point).  A student could 
study C++ for a semester or more and not encounter templates until they 
studied data structures.  So in short, I don't believe that the example 
you chose from Python and the one you chose from C++, were at similar 
levels (not even close).

>    It was the answer to the question "How can I express the
>    class I'm in in, when I can't write that classes name
>    literally? So, ?S? is ?example?.
>    It works like this: The type of ?&f? is ?void ( example::*
>    )()?. So, the function-declaration template ?T? infers ?C?
>    to be ?example?, and the type of ?T( &f )? is ?example?,
>    which then is transferred to the name ?S? using typedef.
>    This is obvious for C++ programmers, but it takes a lot
>    of time to become a C++ programmer, maybe more than it
>    takes to become a Python programmer.