newb question about @property
On 05/10/2017 14:13, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:51 pm, bartc wrote:
>> Am I allowed to say that it all seems a bit of a mess?
> You may or may not be pleased to learn that there's a push to create a "record
> like" or "struct like" datatype for Python 3.7 or 3.8, tentatively called
> a "Data Class" for now.
Yeah, maybe (looks a bit over-ambitious to me; why is it necessary to
have typed fields? Or to do relative compares?)
But it reminds me a bit of the xkcd cartoon about the 14 competing
standards becoming 15...