[Python-Dev] ctypes: is it intentional that id() is the only way to get the address of an object?
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019, 22:11 Steve Dower <steve.dower at python.org wrote:
> For everyone who managed to reply *hours* after Eryk Sun posted the
> correct answer and still get it wrong, here it is again in full.
> As a bonus, here's a link to the place where this answer appears in the
Eryk's answer is actually much more useful than the documentation. I've
read that documentation many times, but always decided not to use py_object
because I couldn't figure out what it would actually do...
(I still probably won't use it because IME by the time I'm using ctypes and
PyObject* together I usually need manual control over refcounts, but it's
nice to know what it actually does.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...