[Python-Dev] Rename Include/internals/ to Include/pycore/
Oh, I forgot to add a reference to the bugs.python.org issue and my
My PR more or less implements the first milestone of my plan
(Py_BUILD_CORE): it creates Include/pycore/.
Le dim. 28 oct. 2018 ? 17:20, Victor Stinner <vstinner at redhat.com> a ?crit :
> Python C API has no strict separation between the 3 levels of API:
> * core: Py_BUILD_CORE define
> * stable: Py_LIMITED_API define (it has a value)
> * regular: no define
> IMHO the current design of header files is done backward: by default,
> everything is public. To exclude an API from core or stable, "#ifdef
> Py_BUILD_CORE" and "#ifndef Py_LIMITED_API" are used. This design
> caused issues in the past: functions, variables or something else
> exposed whereas they were supposed to be "private".
> I propose a practical solution for that: Include/*.h files would only
> be be public API. The "core" API would live in a new subdirectory:
> Include/pycore/*.h. Moreover, files of this subdirectory would have
> the prefix "pycore_". For example, Include/objimpl.h would have a
> twin: Include/pycore/pycore_objimpl.h which extend the public API with
> "core" APIs.
> I also propose to automatically load the twin: Include/objimpl.h would
> load Include/pycore/pycore_objimpl.h if Py_BUILD_CORE is defined:
> #ifdef Py_BUILD_CORE
> # include "pycore/pycore_objimpl.h"
> Only in some rare cases, you would have to explicitly use: #include
> "pycore/pycore_pygetopt.h". This header is fully private, there is no
> public header in Include/pygetopt.h. Or maybe we should modify
> Include/Python.h to also include "pycore/pycore_pygetopt.h" if
> Py_BUILD_CORE is defined? Well, that's just a detail.
> First milestone:
> * Create Include/pycore/
> * Move Py_BUILD_CORE specific code into Include/pycore/pycore_*.h
> * Automatically include pycore files from Include/*.h files (#ifdef
> Second milestone:
> * Find a solution for Py_LIMITED_API :-)
> Backward compatibility? The overall change is fully backward
> compatible. The default API doesn't change. C code (using header fles)
> doesn't have to be changed.
> Only a specific kinds of applications like debugger may have to be
> modified if they really have to access the "core" API, the "most
> private" API. Honestly, today it's unclear to me if this API can
> technically be used outside CPython.