[Python-Dev] Documenting the private C API (was Re: Questions about signal handling.)
On Sep 25, 2018, at 03:44, Victor Stinner <vstinner at redhat.com> wrote:
> By the way, recently, we had to fix yet another bug in signal
> handling. A new function has been added:
> /* bpo-30703: Function called when the C signal handler of Python gets a
> signal. We cannot queue a callback using Py_AddPendingCall() since
> that function is not async-signal-safe. */
Is anybody else concerned about the proliferation of undocumented private C API functions? I?m fine with adding leading underscore functions and macros when it makes sense, but what concerns me is that they don?t appear in the Python C API documentation (AFAICT). That means they are undiscoverable, and their existence and utility is buried in institutional knowledge and obscure places within the C code. And yet, the interpreter relies heavily on them.
Maybe this is better off discussed in doc-sig but I think we need to consider documenting the private C API.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP