[Python-Dev] Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 (was Re: 2018 Python Language Summit coverage, last part)
> actually made those semantics available as an explicit
> "parentlocal NAME" declaration ...:
> > def _list_comp(_outermost_iter):
> > parentlocal item
> > _result = 
> > for x in _outermost_iter:
> > item = x
> > _result.append(x)
> > return _result
> > _expr_result = _list_comp(items)
I'm not sure that's possible. If I understand correctly,
> part of the definition of "parent local" is that "parent"
> refers to the nearest enclosing *non-comprehension* scope,
> to give the expected result for nested comprehensions.
> If that's so, then it's impossible to fully decouple its
> definition from comprehensions.
> Nick's "parentlocal" does refer to the parent, but makes no distinction
between synthesized and user-written functions. If the parent has a
matching parentlocal declaration for the same name then the original really
refers to the grandparent - and so on. Ultimately, it resolves to the
closest enclosing scope in which the name is _not_ declared parentlocal.
In that scope, a "nonlocal" or "global" declaration settles it if one
appears, else the name is local to that scope.
So a nested comprehension would declare its assignment expression targets
as parentlocal in its synthesized function, and in all the containing
synthesized functions generated for containing comprehensions.
This appears in some strained ;-) way "natural" only because there is no
explicit way to declare something "local" in Python. In just about any
other language with closures and nested lexical scopes, comprehensions and
generator expressions would have been implemented via nested functions that
explicitly declared their "for" target names "local". and nothing else.
The only change needed then for PEP 572 (b) semantics would be to declare
assignment expression target names local (if their scope wasn't already
known) in the closest containing non-synthesized block.
None of which really matters. The real question is which semantics are
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...