[Python-Dev] Dealing with tone in an email
On 03.05.2018 21:31, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Thu, 3 May 2018 at 01:27 Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com
> <mailto:p.f.moore at gmail.com>> wrote:
> On 3 May 2018 at 03:26, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info
> <mailto:steve at pearwood.info>> wrote:
> >> Will all due respect, it's sometimes unpredictable what kind of
> >> Anglo-Saxons will take as an insult, as there's lot of obsequiosity
> >> there that doesn't exist in other cultures. To me, "not give a
> >> reads like a familiar version of "not care about something", but
> >> apparently it can be offensive.
> > I'm Anglo-Saxon, and honestly I believe that it is
> thin-skinned to
> > the point of ludicrousness to say that "no-one gives a damn" is an
> > insult. This isn't 1939 when Clark Gable's famous line "Frankly
> my dear,
> > I don't give a damn" was considered shocking. Its 2018 and to
> not give a
> > damn is a more forceful way of saying that people don't care,
> that they
> > are indifferent.
> Sigh. That's not what I was saying at all. I was trying to point out
> that Antoine's claim that people should ignore the rhetoric and that
> complaining about the attitude was unreasonable, was in itself unfair.
> People have a right to point out that a mail like the OP's was badly
> > With respect to Paul, I literally cannot imagine why he thinks that
> > *anyone*, not even the tkinter maintainers or developers themselves,
> > ought to feel *offended* by Ivan's words.
> Personally, they didn't offend me. I don't pretend to know how others
> might take them. But they *did* annoy me. I'm frankly sick of people
> (not on this list) complaining that people who work on projects in
> their own time, free of charge, "don't care enough" or "are ignoring
> my requirement". We all do it, to an extent, and it's natural to get
> frustrated, but the onus is on the person asking for help to be polite
> and fair. And maybe this response was the one where I finally let that
> frustration show through. I may read less email for a week or two,
> just to get a break.
> I had the same response as Paul: annoyed. And while Ivan thought he
> was using "emotional language to drive the point home that it's not
> some nitpick", it actually had the reverse effect on me and caused me
> not to care because I don't need to invite annoyance into my life when
> putting in my personal time into something.
> No one is saying people can't be upset and if you are ever upset
> there's something wrong; we're human beings after all. But those of us
> speaking up about the tone are saying that you can also wait until
> you're not so upset to write an email. This was never going to be
> resolved in an hour, so waiting an hour until you're in a better place
> to write an email that wasn't quite so inflammatory seems like a
> reasonable thing to ask.
Let me express things right from the horse's mouth.
The sole purpose of the tone was to not let the mesage be flat-out ignored.
I had my neutral-toned, to-the-point messages to mailing lists flat-out
ignored one too many times for reasons that I can only guess about.
This time, the situation was too important to let that happen.
Whatever anyone may think of this, it worked. I got my message through,
and got the feedback on the topic that I needed to proceed in resolving
the problem that caused it.
I seriously doubt I could achieve that with a neutral-toned message just
stating the facts: dry facts would not show ppl how this could be
important ("ah, just another n00b struggling with Tkinter basics" or
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/vano%40mail.mipt.ru
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...