[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Gregory P. Smith <greg at krypto.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
>>> My primary concern with the PEP is adding to users confusion when they have to
>>> handle (at least) 5 different types[*] that represent time in Python.
>> My key question to those advocating the use of timedelta instead of Decimal:
>> What should timedelta.total_seconds() return to avoid losing
>> nanosecond precision?
>> How should this be requested when calling the API?
> It should return a float as it does today. ?Add a
> timedelta.total_nanoseconds() call for people wanting high precision
> as a raw number and remind people of the precision limits of
> total_seconds() in the docs.

total_nanoseconds() would return an int() in case that wasn't obvious.

> -gps