[Python-Dev] Naming comprehension syntax [was Re: Informal educator feedback on PEP 572 ...]
Definitely docs first. And we should keep references to generator
expressions too, if only to explain that they've been renamed.
Perhaps someone should try it out in a 3rd party tutorial to see how it
goes? I'm CC'ing Raymond Hettinger.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:57 PM Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 12:05 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>> I think this is worth a try.
> How far do we want to go with this? Update the docs? Update the grammar
> and/or code? I think the former is probably good enough for now to see if
> it takes, and if it does then we can talk about updating code to not
> confuse people.
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:04 PM Chris Barker - NOAA Federal <
>> chris.barker at noaa.gov> wrote:
>>> +1 on advocating the term ?generator comprehension? as a synonym for
>>> ?generator expression? in future documentation and instructional
>>> The long version:
>>> If we were starting from scratch, maybe it would makes sense to use ?
>>> builder? or something else, rather than comprehension. But we?re not
>>> starting from scratch.
>>> And ?list comprehension? has become a pretty universal (or at least
>>> common) term in the python world. So we really can?t expect to re-name
>>> And despite the term having its roots in an esoteric corner of
>>> mathematics, I?ve never seen anyone confused by it ? it?s just a new
>>> word for a new thing to most folks.
>>> Which is actually why ?generator expression? is a bit confusing ? it
>>> seems to have more in common with comprehensions than with generators
>>> (As in: the things functions with a yield in them produce)
>>> In fact, the term ?generator? is a bit confusing itself ? due to it
>>> being a common English word, it seems to refer to the generic idea of
>>> ?a thing that generates values on the fly?, which, of course it can be
>>> in Python. But it actually is a specific type. And you can make a
>>> ?thing that generates values in the fly? with a regular class that
>>> follows the iterator protocol.
>>> So re-using the word in ?generator expression? just adds a bit to the
>>> confusion. (Even though it?s technically correct, it does ?make? an
>>> actual generator object, doesn?t it? (On a phone, so I can?t check)
>>> but that?s kind of an implementation detail.
>>> Also: if you google: ?python list comprehension? you get a LOT of hits
>>> to tutorials, etc.
>>> So it is WAY too late to change that name.
>>> When you google ?python generator expression? the top hit is the
>>> python docs, and the next few are about comparing generator
>>> expressions and list comprehensions.
>>> So I think we could start a new naming scheme for those.
>>> ?cause then we?d get lost of questions about the difference between
>>> generator expressions and generator comprehensions ;-)
>> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...