Subject: Re: [Trove] State of the Trove service tenant deployment model
We are mainly focus on Ironic, we put the DB topics a little bit aside. Sorry.
ovh.com <http://ovh.com> | @pilgrimstack
ï»¿On 11/02/2019 16:51, "Thierry Carrez" <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
Lingxian Kong wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 7:04 AM Darek KrÃ³l <dkrol3 at gmail.com
> <mailto:dkrol3 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hello Lingxian,
> Iâ??ve heard about a few tries of running Trove in production.
> Unfortunately, I didnâ??t have opportunity to get details about
> networking. At Samsung, we introducing Trove into our products for
> on-premise cloud platforms. However, I cannot share too many details
> about it, besides it is oriented towards performance and security is
> not a concern. Hence, the networking is very basic without any
> layers of abstractions if possible.
> Could you share more details about your topology and goals you want
> to achieve in Trove ? Maybe Trove team could help you in this ?
> Unfortunately, Iâ??m not a network expert so I would need to get more
> details to understand your use case better.
> Yeah, I think trove team could definitely help. I've been working on a
> patch to support different sgs for different type of neutron ports,
> the patch is for the use case that `CONF.default_neutron_networks` is
> configured as trove management network.
> Besides, I also have some patches for trove need to be reviewed,
> not sure who are the right people I should ask for review now, but would
> appriciate if you could help.
I think OVH has been deploying Trove as well, or at least considering
it... Ccing Jean-Daniel in case he can bring some insights on that.