[placement][nova][cinder][neutron][blazar][tc][zun] Placement governance switch(back)
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 13:04, BalÃ¡zs Gibizer
<balazs.gibizer at est.tech> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 18:12, Luigi Toscano <ltoscano at redhat.com>
>> On Thursday, 24 September 2020 17:23:36 CEST Stephen Finucane wrote:
>>> Assuming no one steps forward for the Placement PTL role, it would
>>> appear to me that we have two options. Either we look at
>>> Placement to a PTL-less project, or we move it back under nova
>>> governance. To be honest, given how important placement is to nova
>>> other projects now, I'm uncomfortable with the idea of not having a
>>> point person who is ultimately responsible for things like cutting
>>> release (yes, delegation is encouraged but someone needs to herd
>>> cats). At the same time, I do realize that placement is used by
>>> that nova now so nova cores and what's left of the separate
>>> core team shouldn't be the only ones making this decision.
>>> So, assuming the worst happens and placement is left without a PTL
>>> Victoria, what do we want to do?
>> I mentioned this on IRC, but just for completeness, there is another
>> have the Nova candidate PTL (I assume there is just one) also apply
>> Placement PTL, and handle the 2 realms in a personal union.
> As far as I know I'm the only nova PTL candidate so basically you
> asking me to take the Placement PTL role as well. This is a valid
> option. Still, first, I would like to give a chance to the DPL
> concept in Placement in a way yoctozepto suggested.
Bump. Do we 2-3 developers interested in running the Placement project
in distributed project leadership mode in Wallaby?