[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[placement][nova][cinder][neutron][blazar][tc][zun] Placement governance switch(back)

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 13:04, Balázs Gibizer 
<balazs.gibizer at est.tech> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 18:12, Luigi Toscano <ltoscano at redhat.com> 
> wrote:
>> On Thursday, 24 September 2020 17:23:36 CEST Stephen Finucane wrote:
>>>  Assuming no one steps forward for the Placement PTL role, it would
>>>  appear to me that we have two options. Either we look at 
>>> transitioning
>>>  Placement to a PTL-less project, or we move it back under nova
>>>  governance. To be honest, given how important placement is to nova 
>>> and
>>>  other projects now, I'm uncomfortable with the idea of not having a
>>>  point person who is ultimately responsible for things like cutting 
>>> a
>>>  release (yes, delegation is encouraged but someone needs to herd 
>>> the
>>>  cats). At the same time, I do realize that placement is used by 
>>> more
>>>  that nova now so nova cores and what's left of the separate 
>>> placement
>>>  core team shouldn't be the only ones making this decision.
>>>  So, assuming the worst happens and placement is left without a PTL 
>>> for
>>>  Victoria, what do we want to do?
>> I mentioned this on IRC, but just for completeness, there is another 
>> option:
>> have the Nova candidate PTL (I assume there is just one) also apply 
>> for
>> Placement PTL, and handle the 2 realms in a personal union.
> As far as I know I'm the only nova PTL candidate so basically you 
> asking me to take the Placement PTL role as well. This is a valid 
> option. Still, first, I would like to give a chance to the DPL 
> concept in Placement in a way yoctozepto suggested.

Bump. Do we 2-3 developers interested in running the Placement project 
in distributed project leadership[1] mode in Wallaby?


> Cheers,
> gibi
>> Ciao
>> --
>> Luigi