On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, 10:44 Thierry Carrez, <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
> RadosÅ?aw Piliszek wrote:
> > +1 for forking. But that would probably mandate a slight rename to
> > avoid confusion and announce the change in priorities (ceilometer
> > backend vs general-purpose [however unlikely in practice]).
> +1 to renaming if we change the scope of the original project. Something
> like "ceilodb" would make it clear it's just a data backend for
> Ceilometer... but I'll let the volunteers taking it over choose :)
Sounds like a bad idea IMO. I'm sure the codebase is littered with the name
gnocchi, and everyone knows it as such. Projects can change scope and
direction over time, that's ok if it's advertised.
> Happy to help with the infrastructure side of things.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...