RadosÅ?aw Piliszek wrote:
> +1 for forking. But that would probably mandate a slight rename to
> avoid confusion and announce the change in priorities (ceilometer
> backend vs general-purpose [however unlikely in practice]).
+1 to renaming if we change the scope of the original project. Something
like "ceilodb" would make it clear it's just a data backend for
Ceilometer... but I'll let the volunteers taking it over choose :)
Happy to help with the infrastructure side of things.