osdir.com


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[tc] Follow up on action tems


 ---- On Fri, 13 Dec 2019 02:56:37 -0600 Jean-Philippe Evrard <jean-philippe at evrard.me> wrote ----
 > Hello TC members, 
 > 
 > - There are still business opportunities merging for 2019. The process
 > for 2020 need to start soon. Any takers?
 > 
 > - We have pending action items from the last meeting:
 >     - ricolin: contact to Infra team to see if we got more ARM server
 > in our Nodepool
 >     - ricolin/ttx: track the merger of the SIGs self-healing and auto-
 > scaling
 >     - mnaser: static hosting story: Is it restarting? Where are we now?
 >     - ttx: Work on technical vision reflection update
 >     - ricolin/evrardjp: Expect/Request an update from Telemetry team.
 > As mentioned in our channel [7], Rong Zh (PTL for Telemetry) will
 > provide a Telemetry status report (high chance to send it out next
 > week).
 >     - jungleboyj: analysis of the user survey. The patch is out for TCs
 > to review [6]
 >     - ttx: make sure to start the discussion about uc/tc merge in
 > January after the ops meetup
 >     - mnaser: write documentation in governance to clarify what was
 > discussed about stable policy
 > 
 > - We have new action items:
 >   - We need to update our charter for the election terms, to be more
 > flexible. Who is okay with starting this?

I can work on this as discussed on ML and push something up for review today.

-gmann 

 >   - We have plenty of things which are not reviewed, or WIP. Could you
 > update (y)our patches please with either changes or votes?
 >   - aprice has asked me (JP) to write a report for the TC and SIG
 > activities of 2019. If you want to know what I am cooking, or want to
 > help on the text, please join here [5]
 >   - In the next elections, we'll be reducing our (=TC) size temporarily
 > due to the current elections timing proposal. In order to not have this
 > happen again, we should propose a charter change as soon as possible.
 > Can someone tackle this? Please see the conversations here [1] and here
 > [2]
 > 
 > - We still have long action items from PTG:
 >   - For community goal `Drop Python 2.7 Support`, you can find the
 > status update on the ML [9]. React there if you need.
 >   -  The community goal `project specific PTL and contributor guides`
 > proposal patch is under review [8] and will be merged soon.
 >   - gmann is sending an official goal schedule plan [3] . We need TC
 > members to review this as well, as soon as possible. We also need to
 > discuss when should we start the first step for next cycle in schedule
 > during next meeting (if/when patch landed).
 >   - Please also review other patches, like [4] .
 > 
 > And finally, some things to keep in mind:
 >     - We need to promote the first contact sig to organisations that
 > might need help on getting things achieved in OpenStack. 
 > 
 > Regards,
 > JP & Rico
 > 
 > [1] 
 > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-December/011396.html
 > [2] 
 > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-November/011155.html
 > [3] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/698299
 > [4] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691737
 > [5] 
 > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/2019-openstack-foundation-annual-report-draft
 > [6] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/698582/
 > [7] 
 > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2019-12-10.log.html#t2019-12-10T08:54:08
 > [8] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691737
 > [9] 
 > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-December/011432.html
 > 
 > 
 >