osdir.com


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[all] [tc] [osc] [glance] [train] [ptls] Legacy client CLI to OSC review 639376


Hi everyone,

I have abandoned https://review.opendev.org/#/c/639376/ due to the lack
of response on the review itself, and this email thread.

All discussion regarding the legacy CLI client and OSC to please be
constructed through this thread.

As part of step 2 of my outlined plan below, I'd be looking for someone
with particular interest in the transition of legacy CLI and OSC to
step forward and help start a pop-up group.

Thank you,

Alex

On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 08:32 +0000, Alexandra Settle wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> For the Train cycle Artem Goncharov proposed moving the legacy client
> CLIs to OSC. This goal did not move forward due to a broad range of
> concerns and was eventually -1'd by Erno Kuvaja (Glance PTL) as he
> was
> unable to support it from a Glance point of view.
> 
> Moving forward, I'd like to end the discussion in the review [1] by
> abandoning the patch and move this to the mailing list. The following
> looks like it needs to happen:
> 
> 1. This PR should be abandoned. It is not going to be accepted as a
> commmunity goal in this format and the debate within the comments is
> circular. Let's step out of here, and start having conversation
> elsewhere. 
> 
> 2. To start those conversations, a pop-up team would be a suitable
> alternative to begin driving that work. Someone needs to step forward
> to lead the pop-up team. The TC recommends two individuals step
> forwards as indicated in the pop-up team Governance document [2]. 
> 
> 3. I recommend the pop-up team include Erno Kuvaja or a
> representative
> from the Glance team and including Matt Reidemann (who has been
> working
> to close the compute API gaps).
> 
> 4. The leaders must then identify a clear objective, and a clear
> disband criteria.
> 
> If in case the pop-up team decide that this could be better drafted
> as
> a community goal for U, then that is a suitable alternative that can
> be
> defined using the new goal selection criteria that is being defined
> here [3] But this should not be decided before clear objectives are
> defined.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex
> IRC: asettle
> 
> [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/639376/
> [2] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/popup-teams.html
> [3] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/667932/
-- 
Alexandra Settle <a.settle at outlook.com>
IRC: asettle