[cinder] [3rd party ci] Deadline Has Past for Python3 Migration
Thank you for the update.Â Please keep us updated on your progress.
On 8/20/2019 1:56 AM, Hidekazu Nakamura wrote:
> Hi Jay,
> Sorry late.
> NEC is working hard to move NEC Cinder CI to python3.7.
> I updated the py3-ci-review etherpad.
> Hidekazu Nakamura
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jay Bryant <jungleboyj at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2019 12:41 PM
>> To: openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: [cinder] [3rd party ci] Deadline Has Past for Python3 Migration
>> This e-mail has multiple purposes.Â First, I have expanded the mail audience
>> to go beyond just openstack-discuss to a mailing list I have created for all 3rd
>> Party CI Maintainers associated with Cinder.Â I apologize to those of you who
>> are getting this as a duplicate e-mail.
>> For all 3rd Party CI maintainers who have already migrated your systems to
>> using Python3.7...Thank you!Â We appreciate you keeping up-to-date with
>> Cinder's requirements and maintaining your CI systems.
>> If this is the first time you are hearing of the Python3.7 requirement please
>> continue reading.
>> It has been decided by the OpenStack TC that support for Py2.7 would be
>> deprecated .Â The Train development cycle is the last cycle that will support
>> Py2.7 and therefore all vendor drivers need to demonstrate support for Py3.7.
>> It was discussed at the Train PTG that we would require all 3rd Party CIs to be
>> running using Python3 by the Train milestone 2: Â We have been
>> communicating the importance of getting 3rd Party CI running with
>> py3 in meetings and e-mail for quite some time now, but it still appears that
>> nearly half of all vendors are not yet running with Python 3. 
>> If you are a vendor who has not yet moved to using Python 3 please take some
>> time to review this document  as it has guidance on how to get your CI
>> system updated.Â It also includes some additional details as to why this
>> requirement has been set and the associated background.Â Also, please
>> update the py3-ci-review etherpad with notes indicating that you are working
>> on adding py3 support.
>> I would also ask all vendors to review the etherpad I have created as it indicates
>> a number of other drivers that have been marked unsupported due to CI
>> systems not running properly.Â If you are not planning to continue to support a
>> driver adding such a note in the etherpad would be appreciated.
>>  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-py3-ci-review
>>  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/3rdParty-drivers-py3-update