[all] [tc] [osc] [glance] [train] [ptls] Legacy client CLI to OSC review 639376
For the Train cycle Artem Goncharov proposed moving the legacy client
CLIs to OSC. This goal did not move forward due to a broad range of
concerns and was eventually -1'd by Erno Kuvaja (Glance PTL) as he was
unable to support it from a Glance point of view.
Moving forward, I'd like to end the discussion in the review  by
abandoning the patch and move this to the mailing list. The following
looks like it needs to happen:
1. This PR should be abandoned. It is not going to be accepted as a
commmunity goal in this format and the debate within the comments is
circular. Let's step out of here, and start having conversation
2. To start those conversations, a pop-up team would be a suitable
alternative to begin driving that work. Someone needs to step forward
to lead the pop-up team. The TC recommends two individuals step
forwards as indicated in the pop-up team Governance document .
3. I recommend the pop-up team include Erno Kuvaja or a representative
from the Glance team and including Matt Reidemann (who has been working
to close the compute API gaps).
4. The leaders must then identify a clear objective, and a clear
If in case the pop-up team decide that this could be better drafted as
a community goal for U, then that is a suitable alternative that can be
defined using the new goal selection criteria that is being defined
here  But this should not be decided before clear objectives are