On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 17:31, Mark Goddard <mark at stackhpc.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 15:48, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 8:47 AM Mark Goddard <mark at stackhpc.com> wrote:
> >> Thanks for following up. It wouldn't be a trivial change to add
> >> buildah support in kolla, but it would have saved reimplementing the
> >> task parallelisation in Tripleo and would benefit others too. Never
> >> mind.
> > To be fair, at the time I wrote the code in python-tripleoclient the container tooling wasn't really stable and we weren't sure about the directions we would take yet; which is the main reason which drove us to not invest too much time into refactoring Kolla to support a tool that we weren't sure we would end up using in production for the container image building.
> That's fair, sorry to grumble :)
> > It has been a few months now and so far it works ok for our needs; so if there is interest in supporting Buildah in Kolla then we might want to do the refactor and of course TripleO would use this new feature.
If there are resources to do it, I'm sure the Kolla team would be receptive.
> > --
> > Emilien Macchi