[dev][tc][all] Train Goal Schedule and Update
I know ironic has a lot of issues with IPv6, not all of them are even under our
control. I quite doubt we can make it, although I know there is downstream
interest to make it happen.
On 4/17/19 10:15 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> Sending a quick follow-up here. We now have a proposal for ipv6 testing support
> as a community goal . Thanks to gmann for writing it up!
> I encourage folks to have a look if you have time before the PTG.
>  https://review.openstack.org/653545
> On 4/3/19 11:59 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Since the community goal selection process has taken a turn, we wanted to
>> sendÂ an update regarding the current goals. We originally wanted to have the
>> goals for Train be merged by this point to give project teams ample time to
>> plan for them accordingly in their PTG scheduled. Due to discussions raised in
>> each , it doesn't sound like either will be making it into Train as a
>> feasible community goal. Fortunately, a couple of last minute goals might be a
>> perfect fit for Train, instead of having a release without any community goals.
>> The first one suggested is to render documentation as PDFs . The second
>> goal, which still needs to be proposed, is for IPv6 support. The advantage is
>> that both of these goals are much smaller in scope, but still useful. We're
>> running up against the clock on getting goals selected for Train, but we still
>> have an opportunity to come to agreement on the new proposalsbefore the PTG.
>> We'd like to ask TC and members of the community to review the proposed goals
>> at their earliest convenience. Additionally, if someone wants help write up
>> the IPv6 support goal , please reach out gmann and mnaser. Even though
>> we were originally trying to make sure we had firm goals well before the PTG,
>> the reduced scope of the new goals should make them easier to talk about in
>> impromptu sessions or the hallway track.
>> JP & Lance
>>  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/639376/
>>  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/639010/
>>  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/647712/
>>  Note that this goal is for testing IPv6 networking setups in all projects.
>> We already have a tempest full ipv6 job, it would be a matter of making these
>> jobs passing and voting in the future.