Does anyone care about reviewstats?
From: Kanevsky, Arkady
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 11:20 AM
To: openstack at nemebean.com; e0ne at e0ne.info; openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
Subject: RE: Does anyone care about reviewstats?
We do need a single tool for all projects.
From: Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 11:02 AM
To: Ivan Kolodyazhny; OpenStack Discuss
Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats?
On 4/17/19 10:29 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
> I use it but not for a regular basis at the moment.
> Do we have any kind of official place where its results are published?
Not that I know of. Russell used to run it on his site, but I think he changed it to redirect to stackalytics a while back. I publish my output to http://nemebean.com/reviewstats/ but it only includes the projects I am core on.
> Ivan Kolodyazhny,
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:22 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com
> <mailto:Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com>> wrote:
> I do use it
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com
> <mailto:openstack at nemebean.com>>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 2:35 PM
> To: openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
> <mailto:openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats?
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
> On 3/12/19 10:01 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> > On 3/12/19 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> >> There are open reviewstats changes  but the non-infra core
> team is
> >> entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack . I
> >> had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now
> >> by placement  so I just abandoned it.
> >> So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we
> >> should probably just start adding new people to the core team that
> >> actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the
> >> attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people
> >> are already doing).
> > I am still using it. I have a local change that pulls the project
> > from governance instead of the manually curated lists in reviewstats
> > which reduces the maintenance burden somewhat. I'm not sure if it
> > works for all projects though. I mostly use it for the Oslo stats
> > these days and my all projects page hasn't been updated in almost
> > years. I suspect that's because of errors when it tries to process
> > everything, but I haven't really dug into it.
> > So I'm happy to push up my changes, but they may cause other people
> > issues. Of course, given how out of date I suspect the project lists
> > in reviewstats are I'm not sure how much worse I could make it. I
> > doubt the numbers it spits out right now are terribly accurate
> The stackalytics thread prompted me to clean this up and push it to
> gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/653024
> It should help a lot with maintainability of the project lists,
> although I haven't investigated how many mismatches there are
> between the json files and governance. Probably a lot.
> >> 
> >> status:open
> >>  https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members
> >>  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/