Does anyone care about reviewstats?
Www. Stackayltics.com publish all types of stats:)
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 17, 2019, at 8:29 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny <e0ne at e0ne.info> wrote:
> I use it but not for a regular basis at the moment.
> Do we have any kind of official place where its results are published?
> Ivan Kolodyazhny,
>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:22 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:
>> I do use it
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 2:35 PM
>> To: openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
>> Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats?
>> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>> On 3/12/19 10:01 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>> > On 3/12/19 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> >> There are open reviewstats changes  but the non-infra core team is
>> >> entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack . I
>> >> had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned
>> >> by placement  so I just abandoned it.
>> >> So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we
>> >> should probably just start adding new people to the core team that
>> >> actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the
>> >> attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people
>> >> are already doing).
>> > I am still using it. I have a local change that pulls the project list
>> > from governance instead of the manually curated lists in reviewstats
>> > which reduces the maintenance burden somewhat. I'm not sure if it
>> > works for all projects though. I mostly use it for the Oslo stats
>> > these days and my all projects page hasn't been updated in almost two
>> > years. I suspect that's because of errors when it tries to process
>> > everything, but I haven't really dug into it.
>> > So I'm happy to push up my changes, but they may cause other people
>> > issues. Of course, given how out of date I suspect the project lists
>> > in reviewstats are I'm not sure how much worse I could make it. I
>> > doubt the numbers it spits out right now are terribly accurate anyway.
>> The stackalytics thread prompted me to clean this up and push it to
>> gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/653024
>> It should help a lot with maintainability of the project lists, although I haven't investigated how many mismatches there are between the json files and governance. Probably a lot.
>> >> 
>> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+
>> >> status:open
>> >>  https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members
>> >>  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...