osdir.com


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Does anyone care about reviewstats?


I use it but not for a regular basis at the moment.

Do we have any kind of official place where its results are published?

Regards,
Ivan Kolodyazhny,
http://blog.e0ne.info/


On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:22 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:

> I do use it
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 2:35 PM
> To: openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: Does anyone care about reviewstats?
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
>
>
> On 3/12/19 10:01 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/12/19 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> >> There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is
> >> entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I
> >> had a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned
> >> by placement [3] so I just abandoned it.
> >>
> >> So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we
> >> should probably just start adding new people to the core team that
> >> actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the
> >> attic and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people
> >> are already doing).
> >
> > I am still using it. I have a local change that pulls the project list
> > from governance instead of the manually curated lists in reviewstats
> > which reduces the maintenance burden somewhat. I'm not sure if it
> > works for all projects though. I mostly use it for the Oslo stats
> > these days and my all projects page hasn't been updated in almost two
> > years. I suspect that's because of errors when it tries to process
> > everything, but I haven't really dug into it.
> >
> > So I'm happy to push up my changes, but they may cause other people
> > issues. Of course, given how out of date I suspect the project lists
> > in reviewstats are I'm not sure how much worse I could make it. I
> > doubt the numbers it spits out right now are terribly accurate anyway.
>
> The stackalytics thread prompted me to clean this up and push it to
> gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/653024
>
> It should help a lot with maintainability of the project lists, although I
> haven't investigated how many mismatches there are between the json files
> and governance. Probably a lot.
>
> >
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+
> >> status:open
> >>
> >> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members
> >> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/
> >>
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190417/1397413e/attachment.html>