[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Does anyone care about reviewstats?

On 3/12/19 10:01 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 3/12/19 8:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> There are open reviewstats changes [1] but the non-infra core team is 
>> entirely made up of people that no longer work on openstack [2]. I had 
>> a change that was open so long some of the projects are now owned by 
>> placement [3] so I just abandoned it.
>> So the question is, does anyone use reviewstats anymore? If so, we 
>> should probably just start adding new people to the core team that 
>> actually use it. Otherwise we should probably just put it in the attic 
>> and rely on stackalytics (which is probably what most people are 
>> already doing).
> I am still using it. I have a local change that pulls the project list 
> from governance instead of the manually curated lists in reviewstats 
> which reduces the maintenance burden somewhat. I'm not sure if it works 
> for all projects though. I mostly use it for the Oslo stats these days 
> and my all projects page hasn't been updated in almost two years. I 
> suspect that's because of errors when it tries to process everything, 
> but I haven't really dug into it.
> So I'm happy to push up my changes, but they may cause other people 
> issues. Of course, given how out of date I suspect the project lists in 
> reviewstats are I'm not sure how much worse I could make it. I doubt the 
> numbers it spits out right now are terribly accurate anyway.

The stackalytics thread prompted me to clean this up and push it to 
gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/653024

It should help a lot with maintainability of the project lists, although 
I haven't investigated how many mismatches there are between the json 
files and governance. Probably a lot.

>> [1] 
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-infra/reviewstats+status:open 
>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/893,members
>> [3] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499197/