On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 04/10/2019 12:46 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
>> On Apr 9, 2019, at 2:37 PM, Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com> wrote:
>>> We actually have some pretty awesome new container building jobs in Zuul
>>> now - I'd recommend using them. One of the things they can do is build
>>> your container image to be used in a gate job, and then when the patch for
>>> the gate job merges, publish and tag the actual container image used in
>>> the gate.
>> My concern is the one-offness of placedock, not that it wouldn't work. But
>> if Zuul can support this container building step, and we ensure that
>> placedock follows the pattern that Zuul uses, we should be good.
> Yeah, this was my thought as well. If we can (as the placement team) can take
> and own the "recipe" for constructing the container image using the Zuul
> container-image-building playbooks, then I'm 100% on board.
Right, I'll make a proto-story for this and we can pick it back up
post-PTG. Is there anyone itching to take the lead on this? Feel
free to adapt the story and add more tasks and assign yourself if
Chris Dent Ù©â??Ì¯â??Û¶ https://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent tw: @anticdent