[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[nova] "future" specs and blueprints

On 2019-04-02 12:56:51 +0200 (+0200), Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> So yes, having this `specs/backlog/approved` does have a benefit (even
> if it is 'marginal') than "leaving things as unmerged in Gerrit", where
> every spec is a bland Gerrit URL, and their HTML renderings will have
> gotten purged.

If the draft rendering has expired and you don't feel like
generating one locally with tox (or even just by calling
sphinx-build directly), you can also leave a "recheck" comment on
the change and come back later.
Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190402/54f61d68/attachment.sig>