News | Mail Archive | OS Software Downloads Ad Info ::
Subject: Databases | Java | Linux | Open Source | XML | Data | Tech

Contribute:
· News/Reviews/Release
· Submit a New App!

Misc:
· My Account
· Editorial Feedback
· Logout


Login
 Username
 Password
 Remember me


 Become a Member!
 Login Problems?

News via email
Enter your Email



Recently Updated Mail Archives
php-perl_jobs
cocoa-dev
sage-devel
fedora-astronomy-list
macbook-list
chromium-extensions
clojure
lisp-flavoured-erlang
networkmania
gwics
khtml-cvs
jobs-for-citizens-and-gc
help-flex-gnu
ubuntu-studio-devel
oracle9i_pl-sql
rfc2109-cvs
mcse-jobs
c-users-xerces.apache.org
gnome-in-list
debian-webapps-debian
Popular Mail Lists: windows linux solaris osx ubuntu fedora enterprise crm ruby python java xml perl php cvs subversion version contol db
database mysql postgresql mobile telephony voip apple apache
all
sitemap (mail)


Login/Become a Member! | 28 Comments
Threshold
Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
Re: An Interview with Tom Lord of Arch on Versioning Systems (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Nov 25, 2004 - 08:05 AM
I don't mind it when people bash other projects, so long as they can support their statements with verifiable and empirical arguments. Tom Lord was doing well being specific in his bashing. Unfortunately, he still left much to being assumed truths.

Personally, I'd like to read an article that discuess nothing but the perceived disadvantages or design faults of the different revision control systems that includes an in-depth and detailed discussion of the rationale. They can't always assume that readers have read all the mailing lists. It'd be nice to read an article which didn't.



Advertise With Us! | Comments are property of their posters.
Copyrighted (c) 2009, but we're happy to let you use what you wish with attribution. OSDir.com
All logos and trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
OSDir is an inevitable website. super tiny logo | Contact | Privacy Policy

Page created in 0.342621 seconds.