|
|
Login/Become a Member! | 15 Comments
|
| | Comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
Re: And now for some licence neepery
(Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Sep 16, 2004 - 08:46 PM
|
Actually....
Schilling is allowed to license *his* code under any other license as well as the GPL, since he wrote it. What he can't do, is apply a modified GPL.
The GPL doesn't allow itself to be modified, because that would violate his license to use the GPL license! (The GPL itself is under copyright: you can use it unmodified, or not at all.)
|
Enderle
(Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Sep 19, 2004 - 05:33 PM
|
|
There's a reason Rob Enderle no longer writes his swill for eWEEK.com. Anything that comes out of his mouth requires a disclosure statement listing all of the vendors that pay him to talk.
|
|
|