logo       

Re: Forum organization: msg#00013

windows.dotnet.spring.devel

Subject: Re: Forum organization

I see...

We should probably add Enterprise Services (Serviced Components) top-level
board. One thing to remember is that forum boards don't necessarily have to
match modules within the project one-to-one, so it is perfectly fine to have
two top-level boards for Spring.Services module.

-- Aleks

________________________________

From: Bruno Baia [mailto:brbaia@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 12:16 PM
To: Aleksandar Seovic
Cc: Mark Pollack; Spring Developer
Subject: Re: [Springnet-developer] Forum organization


Ok

It's just that we don't see where goes EnterpriseServices stuffs, that's why
i wanted to change the forum name for everthing relate to "communication".

So if i understand what you mean, Spring.Interop will be in an integration
project in the future ?


-Bruno

2006/7/28, Aleksandar Seovic <aleks@xxxxxxxxxx>:

1. Forum for integrations, with a separate board for each
integration: +1

2. Services is too generic for a forum name. I really don't see
anything wrong with "Web Services and Remoting" -- it's pretty clear what it
means.

3. Windows Services forum should remain where it is now, as a
top-level forum. It's really not an integration project, but a framework for
Spring-enabled Windows Services development, analogous to Spring.Web or new
Windows Forms stuff. However, we do need to clean up project/solution files
and separate Spring.WindowsServices from Spring.Services module as they are
not related in any way.

-- Aleks

________________________________

From: springnet-developer-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:springnet-developer-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark
Pollack
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 8:40 PM
To: Bruno Baia; Spring Developer
Subject: Re: [Springnet-developer] Forum organization


Hi,

Yea, we chatted about it.

We certainly need a forum for the Spring.Net.Integration project, so
I'll do that ASAP for NHibernate. If you could move the Atlas code under
the integration module that would be great - the common area has a .bat file
for bootstrapping a new project, i.e. directory structure/.build/.sln files
etc.

Spring Services as a forum name is kinda generic...let me think
about the name a bit more - maybe the description would be enough to clarify
but it doesn't jump out and grab you when quickly scanning the forum list.

To me the "Windows Service" doesn't go under integration since it is
dependent on classes in the BCL.... maybe we can just leave that as it
is...

We also need to have seperate jira project for the integration
projects... I'll see what I can arrange on that front as I don't want to
"pollute" the shared instance of jira we have now with the Spring.Java
project....

Cheers,
Mark




________________________________

From: springnet-developer-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:springnet-developer-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Bruno Baia
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 8:13 AM
To: Spring Developer
Subject: [Springnet-developer] Forum organization


Hi,

I think i already talked about this to someone (maybe Mark
?).

To rename "Web services and remoting" forum to "Services" or
something (everything related to Spring.Services).
To create a Spring Integration forum group in which we can
move the "Windows Services" forum and create a forum for each "Spring.Net
integration" project (NHbinernate, IBatis, Interop, Atlas, etc....)

What do you think ?


Cheers,
Bruno





-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise