Subject: Re: NTime discussion - msg#00006

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: [PATCH] NUnit constraints made to use inNUnit.Mock

Hi Kouji, I'm about to catch a plane, but I'll review the patch sometime in the next few days and get back to you. Charlie > -----Original Message----- > From: nunit-developer-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:nunit-developer-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Kouji Matsui > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 4:14 AM > To: nunit-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [nunit-developer] [PATCH] NUnit constraints made to > use inNUnit.Mock > > Hi, > > As for NUnit.Mock that has been released now, a detailed > assertion cannot be done. > Then, when the object of comparison has succeeded to the > NUnit.Framework.Constraints.Constraint class, it has improved > it to use Assert.That. > > It is wanted to add it to the following release. > > #I am sorry for quick dirty hack this code. > #I cannot do with TDD because I am very busy :-) > > Thanks. > > ---------------------- > Kouji Matsui > mailto:k@xxxxxxxxx > # It will be automatically discarded if the attached file of > # executable files or "HTML mail" is transmitted to this mail address. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: [PATCH] NUnit constraints made to use inNUnit.Mock

Hi Kouji, A nice improvement. It's in my codebase and will be in the 2.4.6 release. Charlie > -----Original Message----- > From: nunit-developer-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:nunit-developer-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Kouji Matsui > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:14 PM > To: nunit-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [nunit-developer] [PATCH] NUnit constraints made to > use inNUnit.Mock > > Hi, > > As for NUnit.Mock that has been released now, a detailed > assertion cannot be done. > Then, when the object of comparison has succeeded to the > NUnit.Framework.Constraints.Constraint class, it has improved > it to use Assert.That. > > It is wanted to add it to the following release. > > #I am sorry for quick dirty hack this code. > #I cannot do with TDD because I am very busy :-) > > Thanks. > > ---------------------- > Kouji Matsui > mailto:k@xxxxxxxxx > # It will be automatically discarded if the attached file of > # executable files or "HTML mail" is transmitted to this mail address. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

NUnit Extensions Directory

I have created a set of pages on the web site to list extensions created for use with NUnit. Right now it's a bit sparse but I'll add to it as I receive submittals. It's located at http://nunit.org/?p=extensions Charlie ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Possible bug with different versions of log4net...

Hello all,   In one of my projects, log4net version 1.2.9.0 is used.  I just upgraded to the latest version of nunit (2.4.6) through the msi, which uses log4net version 1.2.10.0.  When trying to load my unit test assembly, I get the following error:   System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException : Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation. System.TypeInitializationException : The type initializer for “NUnit.Core.RemoteTestRunner” threw an exception. System.IO.FileLoadException : The located assembly’s manifest definition with name ‘log4net’ does not match the assembly reference.   (Stack trace at end of email)   If I delete the log4net assembly from the bin directory of my application, then the assembly loads fine in the nunit GUI.  It seems to me that nunit does not properly support a version of log4net different than the one it uses.  Is this a bug, or am I missing something?  I have created a small test project that can be used to reproduce the error as well, which I can attach if needed.   Thanks, Rich   Stack trace as promised: System.IO.FileLoadException...    at NUnit.Core.RemoteTestRunner..cctor()   System.TypeInitializationException...     System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException...   Server stack trace:    at System.Reflection.RuntimeConstructorInfo.InternalInvoke(BindingFlags invokeAttr, Binder binder, Object[] parameters, CultureInfo culture, Boolean isBinderDefault)    at System.Reflection.RuntimeConstructorInfo.Invoke(BindingFlags invokeAttr, Binder binder, Object[] parameters, CultureInfo culture)    at System.RuntimeType.CreateInstanceImpl(BindingFlags bindingAttr, Binder binder, Object[] args, CultureInfo culture, Object[] activationAttributes)    at System.Activator.CreateInstance(Type type, BindingFlags bindingAttr, Binder binder, Object[] args, CultureInfo culture, Object[] activationAttributes)    at System.Activator.CreateInstance(String assemblyName, String typeName, Boolean ignoreCase, BindingFlags bindingAttr, Binder binder, Object[] args, CultureInfo culture, Object[] activationAttributes, Evidence securityInfo, StackCrawlMark& stackMark)    at System.Activator.CreateInstance(String assemblyName, String typeName, Boolean ignoreCase, BindingFlags bindingAttr, Binder binder, Object[] args, CultureInfo culture, Object[] activationAttributes, Evidence securityInfo)    at System.AppDomain.CreateInstance(String assemblyName, String typeName, Boolean ignoreCase, BindingFlags bindingAttr, Binder binder, Object[] args, CultureInfo culture, Object[] activationAttributes, Evidence securityAttributes)    at System.AppDomain.CreateInstanceAndUnwrap(String assemblyName, String typeName, Boolean ignoreCase, BindingFlags bindingAttr, Binder binder, Object[] args, CultureInfo culture, Object[] activationAttributes, Evidence securityAttributes)    at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink.PrivateProcessMessage(MethodBase mb, Object[] args, Object server, Int32 methodPtr, Boolean fExecuteInContext, Object[]& outArgs)    at System.Runtime.Remoting.Messaging.StackBuilderSink.SyncProcessMessage(IMessage msg, Int32 methodPtr, Boolean fExecuteInContext)   Exception rethrown at [0]:    at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg)    at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type)    at System.AppDomain.CreateInstanceAndUnwrap(String assemblyName, String typeName, Boolean ignoreCase, BindingFlags bindingAttr, Binder binder, Object[] args, CultureInfo culture, Object[] activationAttributes, Evidence securityAttributes)    at NUnit.Util.TestDomain.MakeRemoteTestRunner(AppDomain runnerDomain)    at NUnit.Util.TestDomain.Load(TestPackage package)    at NUnit.Util.TestLoader.ReloadTest()   ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace_______________________________________________ nunit-developer mailing list nunit-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nunit-developer