|
Re: Use of ExpectedExceptionAttribute class in unit tests: msg#00062windows.dotnet.nunit.devel
On 12/14/05, Boris Partensky <Boris.Partensky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > [ExpectedComException(0xEEBF004EL)] > > public void TestAddInvalidConstraintToPO() > > { > > Utils.TestComException(0xEEBF004EL(); > > } > > > Some months ago I have proposed changes in ExpectedExceptions, which allowed to test a particular property of the exception, not only the message. For some reason, such a change was not welcomed, but maybe your post will rise again a discussion about it. Cheers -- Svetoslav Milenov (Sunny) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Suggestion for NUnit: 00062, Charlie Poole |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Ann: NUnit 2.2.4 Production Release: 00062, Charlie Poole |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Use of ExpectedExceptionAttribute class in unit testsi: 00062, Charlie Poole |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Use of ExpectedExceptionAttribute class in unit tests: 00062, Charlie Poole |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |