Re: NUnit Version Numbering

Charlie Poole wrote:

> Matt Hargett wrote:
>
> > You mentioned the different version in the bug, but another possibility
>> would be to name things differently.  That is, the 1.x build remains
>> nunit-* and the 2.x build would be nunit2-*.

That sounds bad -- like nunit2 is an entirely new version of nunit (as 
with nmock and nmock2).

> What about the possiblility of simply using local assemblies for all but the
> initial exe? Even that could be eliminated by the use of a script.

What do you mean by "initial exe"?  nunit-console?  Then I think you can 
simply use local assemblies everywhere.

> > Right now for them to run their .NET 2.x assembly tests, they have a
> > .NET 2.x-compiled nunit binary in their source tree that does not get
> > installed. I was able to "workaround" in a real PIA fashion to get the
> > above bug to not show up.
>
> PIA?

Pain in the *.  :-)

--
_______________________________________________

Felix Wiemann
Software-Tester
Produktentwicklung

dSPACE GmbH          Tel.:  +49 5251 1638-923
Technologiepark 25
33100 Paderborn      http://www.dspace.de
Germany              mailto:fwiemann@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click