logo       

RE: Active User Stories: msg#00014

windows.dotnet.nunit.devel

Subject: RE: Active User Stories

 

 

Hi Charlie,

 

General response first:

I think it is understandable that some OpenSource projects want to keep their doors at least partially closed. I personally think that a centralized project administration makes for a better end-product with robust well-thought-out features.

 

I think that the Wiki is a great idea, but it seems like it does need a bit of revival. I'd be glad to help.

 

Maybe there should be a small FAQ about contributing. It would certainly help people get started.

 

Specific:

RegexAssert is pretty trivial to implement.

I have bundled a WildCard asserter with it as well, as it is sometimes useful.

 

I understand your concerns regarding the Severity issue. And you're probably right. I found that it is a useful concept for extremely large projects. In retrospect, I think that an all or nothing pass is not a bad idea. I have implemented this based on OutputAttributeToXml

 

As I mentioned, I have implemented the OutputAttributeToXML functionality as well. As requested, details will follow offline.

 

Let me take a look at the TimeOut… I'll get back to you.

 

As an aside, I've patched together a neat utility I cal NUnitParser. It reads the XML result files from a bunch of test runs and performs some analysis. It also generates reports and sends email to test-owners notifying them of failures. I will be posting it on my blog in a couple of days, after a bit more polish. I intend to add some report escalation behavior and historical comparisons at some stage.

 

Thanks,

Shmarya

 


From: Charlie Poole [mailto:cpoole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 9:05 PM
To: Rubenstein, Shmarya; nunit-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [nunit-developer] Active User Stories

 

Hi Shmarya,

 

First, the general approach to contributing, for the benefit of any others on the list, as well as for you directly…

 

Contact us via this list, or directly, to figure out what you might best work on. To avoid overlap, it’s a good idea to do this before you start.

 

Some Open Source projects take just about all contributions while others are tightly controlled. NUnit is somewhere in the middle. We want to ensure that what we implement fits the vision we have for the software. At the same time, we feel that folks with new ideas need to be heard from.

 

The developer’s wiki was our first attempt to strike a balance. We maintain “stories” there in various categories. ActiveStories are being worked on – although the page will not necessarily tell you by whom. New Stories are those we have not yet discussed, so we may or may not want to do them. HelpWanted lists stories we are actively seeking volunteers for.

 

Unfortunately, the wiki has not attracted a lot of use. Most of the updates have been from me, so I’ve been considering this as a failed approach and probably not worth maintaining. Shmarya, you made an update about two weeks ago, but it didn’t get noticed. If people think the wiki should be revived, please let me know – along with any ideas on how to revive it.

 

Recently, I created a Development section of the website and moved the wiki NUnit Vision and Roadmap pages there. See http://nunit.com/testweb/index.php?p=roadmap. Along with the old “Community” page, these give a general idea of where we want to go. What we lack – at least IMO – is a specific set of instructions about what to do if you want to contribute. Ideas are welcome.

 

Now to the specific case..

 

RegexAssert was an active story, but not much has been done. Please send me your code and we’ll take it from there. You can use either charlie@xxxxxxxxx or charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

 

MarkTestsWithSeverity is about allowing tests to have a “level of failure.” Traditional unit testing says that everything has to pass. I’d want to have a lot of discussion about this before implementing it in NUnit. As an extension – not part of the core – I have fewer problems with it. See http://nunit.com/testweb/index.php?p=vision for a bit about the role of extensions in implementing non-unit-testing, non-TDD features in NUnit. Shall we try to have discussion on this list?

 

OutputTestAttribute to Xml seems like a nice idea. I’m offline as I write this, so I haven’t been able to look at your website yet. How do you distinguish which attributes should go to the XML? Are you assuming that all unrecognized attributes are for this purpose? How will you deal with addins that process attributes on their own? This one is more of a technical discussion than a philosophical one, so we can go offline for the details. One issue will come up for NUnit 2.6… I’d like to see what – if any – standards exist for reporting on tests using XML and conform to one of them. If there are none, I guess we can create one.

 

TimeOutAttribute, as I noted in the wiki, would make a super extensibility example. I particularly like it because it points out a weakness in our extensibility model that I would like to fix. As currently used, you can create a custom test fixture or test case. But you can’t take an existing test case and add an attribute to it, adding behavior to what’s already there. It’s pretty obvious that the decorator pattern is involved, but the mechanics of specifying a decorator in a way that it can be applied to any test case, including extensions that have not yet been written, is tricky. This is definitely an order of magnitude more challenging than just implementing TimeOutAttribute as a part of the nunit core, but if you’re up for it we should discuss in more detail.

 

 

It’s great to see your enthusiasm for contributing. The roadmap is actually a two-way street. It tells us where we want to go, but individual contributors have their own interests and that changes the roadmap. Take a look at it and get back to me offline about other areas you’d like to work in as well.

 

Charlie

 

 

Charlie

 

 


From: nunit-developer-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:nunit-developer-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rubenstein, Shmarya
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 10:25 PM
To: nunit-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [nunit-developer] Active User Stories

 

Hi,

 

I've implemented the following story from the Active Stories list on the Wiki.

 

http://nunit.com/devwiki.cgi?RegexAssert

 

They didn't seem to be assigned to anyone.

 

Where can I submit the code?

 

I have also implemented these stories from the New Stories list (I submitted the stories as well).

http://nunit.com/devwiki.cgi?MarkTestsWithSeverity

http://nunit.com/devwiki.cgi?OutputTestAttributeToXml

 

I also have a partially completed implementation of this story:

http://nunit.com/devwiki.cgi?TimeoutAttribute

 

I'd love to be able to contribute my implementations, and get some guidance on which stories have highest priority and are unassigned, so I can spend my time working on the most valuable stuff I can.

 

Thanks,

 

Shmarya Rubenstein

NDS Technologies Israelsrubenstein@xxxxxxx - +972 2 5894350 - +972 52 8819507

 

***********************************************************************************
This email message and any attachments thereto are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named above, and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the postmaster@xxxxxxx and destroy the original message.
***********************************************************************************

***********************************************************************************
This email message and any attachments thereto are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named above, and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the postmaster@xxxxxxx and destroy the original message.
***********************************************************************************
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise