Re: NUnit Version Numbering

>
> That said, the .Net 2.0 version is out there to download, if that's what you
> prefer. Just get NUnit-Net-2.0-2.2.3.msi.

OK, it seems I just couldn't find this version. The download page
http://www.nunit.org/download.html do not link this version.
I'm downloading the 2.0-2.2.3 right now and probably it will work for
me just fine.

>
> > This is why we need to distinguish those versions by some kind of
> > numbering schema. I do not understand why did you dropped the idea of
> > having 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 in parallel.
>
> As I stated in the original post, I'm running both the NUnit 2.2.3 and the
> NUnit-Net-2.0 2.2.3 versions on the same machine, in parallel, with no

Ok. From your previous posts I just understood that
2.0.2.2.3  will be called  2.2.4  and [0.0.]2.2.3 will be 2.2.3  ;-)

as 2.0.2.2.3 is much less convenient version number, it would be nice
to reconsider the previous ideas.

Also, in order to have both 2.0.2.2.3 and 2.2.3 assemblies in the GAC
(which is the default install scenario for mono) we would need to do
some special hacks, so having a better way to distinguish those
assemblies is a necessity.


--
Kamil Skalski
http://nazgul.omega.pl


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click