RE: NUnit Version Numbering

Hi Kamil,

> > > > 1. NUnit 2.2.3 was released in two builds, one using .Net 1.1 and
> the
> > > other
> > > > using .Net 2.0. The same version number was used for both versions
> and
> > > this
> > > > seems to cause no problems. Please let me know if any are
> encountered.
> 
> As I pointed out in another email, it DO cause problems. You cannot
> execute tests compiled using .Net 2.0 using this (2.2.3) version of
> NUnit. There is a need to have a separate build for .Net 2.0 and .Net
> 1.1.

With regret, I have to say that you must be doing something wrong, as I
already pointed out in response to your earlier note.

I'm running 2.2.3 against tests compiled using .Net 2.0. Others are doing
the same. It does require making changes to the config or using a
commandline option. If you can give some details about what you have done -
not just saying it doesn't work - perhaps we can figure it out together.

That said, the .Net 2.0 version is out there to download, if that's what you
prefer. Just get NUnit-Net-2.0-2.2.3.msi.

> This is why we need to distinguish those versions by some kind of
> numbering schema. I do not understand why did you dropped the idea of
> having 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 in parallel.

As I stated in the original post, I'm running both the NUnit 2.2.3 and the
NUnit-Net-2.0 2.2.3 versions on the same machine, in parallel, with no
problems. OTOH, if there are some issues, we'll fix them. Have you installed
both versions? What problems do you see? Be sure to tell us exactly what
versions of the CLR you have installed and what you've done to the config to
get 2.2.3 to run.

Charlie
> 
> --
> Kamil Skalski
> http://nazgul.omega.pl




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click