|
Re: NUnit Version Numbering: msg#00000windows.dotnet.nunit.devel
> > > > > > 1. NUnit 2.2.3 was released in two builds, one using .Net 1.1 and the > > other > > > using .Net 2.0. The same version number was used for both versions and > > this > > > seems to cause no problems. Please let me know if any are encountered. As I pointed out in another email, it DO cause problems. You cannot execute tests compiled using .Net 2.0 using this (2.2.3) version of NUnit. There is a need to have a separate build for .Net 2.0 and .Net 1.1. This is why we need to distinguish those versions by some kind of numbering schema. I do not understand why did you dropped the idea of having 2.2.3 and 2.2.4 in parallel. -- Kamil Skalski http://nazgul.omega.pl ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: NUnit Version Numbering: 00000, Charlie Poole |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | Re: NUnit Version Numberingi: 00000, Jamie Cansdale |
| Next by Thread: | RE: NUnit Version Numbering: 00000, Charlie Poole |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |