Re: SVN autogetsource

Hi,

I've also been reading too. We should use 'svn update' to be more
consistent with the other SCMs (we'd use svn checkout when we come
around to implementing 'initialize()') . See
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/svnbook-1.1/re28.html

User and Password are already used in the Svn class, but I do think we
should use '--non-interactive' which doesn't seem to have been used so
far.

This is out of scope for 0.7 which is now bug fixes only, but I
anticipate 0.7.1 to be a fairly quick release.

Mike

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:11:18 +0100, Thibaut Barrère
<thibaut.barrere-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Mike and all
> 
> I've been using SVN, although not much from the command line (I use
> TortoiseSVN which is a great front end, inspired by TortoiseCVS which
> is great as well).
> 
> I had a quick look here though : http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
> A valid command line seems to be (maybe other users with more everyday
> use can comment on this ?) :
> 
> svn --password PASS --username NAME checkout URL
> 
> There's also an option which I noticed :
> --no-auth-cache : prevents caching of authentication information (e.g.
> username and password) in the Subversion administrative directories.
> 
> I don't know the behaviour when you do checkout in an already checked
> out folder.
> 
> Should we target SVN auto getsource for 0.7 final ? I've heard it
> would be appreciated :)


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idU88&alloc_id065&op=click