|
Re: log4net -- Is it the best?: msg#00140windows.devel.dotnet.web
"word" not "work". > -----Original Message----- > From: Discussion of building .NET applications targeted for > the Web [mailto:DOTNET-WEB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Kevin Hegg > Sent: 01/28/2005 12:03 PM > To: DOTNET-WEB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [DOTNET-WEB] log4net -- Is it the best? > > Here is the work from the EntLib 2.0 lead at Microsoft. > > http://weblogs.asp.net/scottdensmore/archive/2005/01/28/362404.aspx > =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Reports development in .NET web applcations: 00140, Padala, Parikshith [IT] |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Security/Permission issue with OWC 11.0 on a Win dows 2003 server: 00140, Nicholas Palmer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: log4net -- Is it the best?i: 00140, Kevin Hegg |
| Next by Thread: | Re: log4net -- Is it the best?: 00140, Chris Martin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |