osdir.com
mailing list archive
Monthly Indexes
2008-10
2008-09
2008-08
2008-07
2008-06
2008-05
2008-04
2008-03
2008-02
2008-01
2007-12
2007-11
2007-10
2007-09
2007-08
2007-07
2007-06
2007-05
2007-04
2007-03
2007-02
2007-01
2006-12
2006-11
2006-10
2006-09
2006-08
2006-07
2006-06
2006-05
2006-04
2006-03
2006-02
2006-01
2005-12
2005-11
2005-10
Previous Period
Next Period
windows.devel.dotnet.rhino-mocks (thread)
Re: GetObjectData not marked as virtual?
Re: GetObjectData not marked as virtual?
Multiple SetupResults
Re: Multiple SetupResults
Newb Question: Mocking An Interface & HttpContext?
Re: Newb Question: Mocking An Interface & HttpContext?
Re: Newb Question: Mocking An Interface & HttpContext?
Re: Newb Question: Mocking An Interface & HttpContext?
What state should MockRepository be in when your imbetween tests?
Re: What state should MockRepository be in when your imbetween tests?
AssertWasCalled + VerifyAll
Re: AssertWasCalled + VerifyAll
Re: AssertWasCalled + VerifyAll
Re: AssertWasCalled + VerifyAll
Getting expectation violations for expectations that haven't explicitly been made
Re: Getting expectation violations for expectations that haven't explicitly been made
Re: Getting expectation violations for expectations that haven't explicitly been made
Re: Getting expectation violations for expectations that haven't explicitly been made
anonymous method
Re: anonymous method
Re: anonymous method
MockRepository.GenerateMock<T> for class without default constructor
Re: MockRepository.GenerateMock<T> for class without default constructor
Re: MockRepository.GenerateMock<T> for class without default constructor
Re: MockRepository.GenerateMock<T> for class without default constructor
InvalidOperationException
Re: InvalidOperationException
Re: InvalidOperationException
Re: InvalidOperationException
Re: InvalidOperationException
Re: InvalidOperationException
Re: InvalidOperationException
Re: InvalidOperationException
Re: InvalidOperationException
SetupResult.For on readonly property
Re: SetupResult.For on readonly property
Re: SetupResult.For on readonly property
Mocking Array Indexer
Re: Mocking Array Indexer
Re: Mocking Array Indexer
How test data layer functionality that uses Linq to SQL
Help, VB syntax problem?
Re: Help, VB syntax problem?
Re: Help, VB syntax problem?
Re: Help, VB syntax problem?
Re: Help, VB syntax problem?
Re: Help, VB syntax problem?
Set return value for ReadOnly Property
Re: Set return value for ReadOnly Property
Re: Set return value for ReadOnly Property
Re: Set return value for ReadOnly Property
Re: Set return value for ReadOnly Property
How can you add an expectation for an event to be unsubscribed from
Re: How can you add an expectation for an event to be unsubscribed from
Issue and workaround with OutRef and Callback.
Re: Issue and workaround with OutRef and Callback.
Re: Issue and workaround with OutRef and Callback.
Re: Issue and workaround with OutRef and Callback.
Re: Issue and workaround with OutRef and Callback.
Re: Suggestion: Change default repeat behavior for stubs to ...Repeat.Any().
Re: Suggestion: Change default repeat behavior for stubs to ...Repeat.Any().
Re: Suggestion: Change default repeat behavior for stubs to ...Repeat.Any().
Re: Suggestion: Change default repeat behavior for stubs to ...Repeat.Any().
Re: Suggestion: Change default repeat behavior for stubs to ...Repeat.Any().
Re: Suggestion: Change default repeat behavior for stubs to ...Repeat.Any().
Re: Suggestion: Change default repeat behavior for stubs to ...Repeat.Any().
Trouble Verifying SqlCommand.Parameters Collection
Re: Trouble Verifying SqlCommand.Parameters Collection
Re: Trouble Verifying SqlCommand.Parameters Collection
Re: Trouble Verifying SqlCommand.Parameters Collection
Re: Trouble Verifying SqlCommand.Parameters Collection
Re: Trouble Verifying SqlCommand.Parameters Collection
Re: Trouble Verifying SqlCommand.Parameters Collection
Re: Trouble Verifying SqlCommand.Parameters Collection
Is there a way to verify a single expectation in RM3.5?
Re: Is there a way to verify a single expectation in RM3.5?
Re: Is there a way to verify a single expectation in RM3.5?
Proper usage when negative testing.
Re: Proper usage when negative testing.
Re: Proper usage when negative testing.
How do you write out messages from a callback message to the test\output window in MSDev?
Re: How do you write out messages from a callback message to the test\output window in MSDev?
Re: How do you write out messages from a callback message to the test\output window in MSDev?
Re: How do you write out messages from a callback message to the test\output window in MSDev?
Problems runn
Re: Problems runn
Re: Problems runn
Re: Problems runn
Re: Problems runn
Re: Problems runn
Re: Problems runn
Extending the list element contraint.
Re: Extending the list element contraint.
Type ... is attempting to implement an inaccessible interface
Re: Type ... is attempting to implement an inaccessible interface
Re: Type ... is attempting to implement an inaccessible interface
Stub is returning a null value
Re: Stub is returning a null value
Re: Stub is returning a null value
Again a "Repeat" question.
Re: Again a "Repeat" question.
Re: Again a "Repeat" question.
Mocking a method call on the class that you are testing?
Re: Mocking a method call on the class that you are testing?
Re: Mocking a method call on the class that you are testing?
Mocking COM objects
Re: Mocking COM objects
ActiveRecord and ISession.SaveOrUpdate
Re: ActiveRecord and ISession.SaveOrUpdate
Re: ActiveRecord and ISession.SaveOrUpdate
Re: ActiveRecord and ISession.SaveOrUpdate
Re: ActiveRecord and ISession.SaveOrUpdate
New Arg<T> Syntax for Argument Constraints
Re: New Arg<T> Syntax for Argument Constraints
Re: New Arg<T> Syntax for Argument Constraints
Re: New Arg<T> Syntax for Argument Constraints
Re: New Arg<T> Syntax for Argument Constraints
Re: calling more than once
AssetWasCalled with Times() constraint
Re: AssetWasCalled with Times() constraint
Re: AssetWasCalled with Times() constraint
Re: AssetWasCalled with Times() constraint
Is it possible to mock Static Method?
Re: Is it possible to mock Static Method?
RM 3.5 Stubs
Re: RM 3.5 Stubs
Re: RM 3.5 Stubs
Re: RM 3.5 Stubs
Re: RM 3.5 Stubs
Re: RM 3.5 Stubs
Re: RM 3.5 Stubs
Re: RM 3.5 Stubs
Re: RM 3.5 Stubs
Re: RM 3.5 Stubs
hardships on trying to mock a class with a property with no setter
Re: hardships on trying to mock a class with a property with no setter
Re: hardships on trying to mock a class with a property with no setter
Re: hardships on trying to mock a class with a property with no setter
Re: hardships on trying to mock a class with a property with no setter
Re: hardships on trying to mock a class with a property with no setter
Re: hardships on trying to mock a class with a property with no setter
Re: hardships on trying to mock a class with a property with no setter
Re: hardships on trying to mock a class with a property with no setter
Re: hardships on trying to mock a class with a property with no setter
Re: hardships on trying to mock a class with a property with no setter
Re: hardships on trying to mock a class with a property with no setter
Only one test in a fixture passes at a time
Re: Only one test in a fixture passes at a time
Re: Only one test in a fixture passes at a time
Re: Only one test in a fixture passes at a time
Re: Only one test in a fixture passes at a time
Re: Only one test in a fixture passes at a time
Re: Attribute dependency
Re: Attribute dependency
Expectations not matched when they should
Re: Expectations not matched when they should
Re: Expectations not matched when they should
Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Problems mocking IInvocation
Re: Possible bug, stub when class having protected set accessor
Re: Possible bug, stub when class having protected set accessor