Re: C# 3.0

Most of the features introduced were designed to allow for LINQ and
relational semantics to enter the language. *shrug* Don't like 'em, don't
use 'em.

Ted Neward
Author, Presenter, Consultant
Java, .NET, XML services
http://www.neward.net/ted

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Discussion relating to the specifics of the C# and Managed C++
> languages [mailto:DOTNET-CX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stoyan Damov
> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 7:25 AM
> To: DOTNET-CX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [DOTNET-CX] C# 3.0
>
>  On 9/14/05, Eyvind Axelsen <eyvind.axelsen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Language specification, examples etc can be found here:
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/vcsharp/future/default.aspx
> >
> > Very cool!
> >
> > Eyvind.
>
>   I think I'm going to puke:
>  The implictly typed local variables and arrays extension is letting lazy
> bastards write JavaScript in C#.
>  The object initializers extension is something which I expected in C#
> 1.0.
>  The collection intializers extension is useless, and can only serve book
> writers write contrived examples.
>  The anonymous types extension is a replacement of a worst practice, which
> is returning a quick-and-dirty tupple (tripplet, whatever). We used to
> return object[] for doing that.
>  The lamda functions extension is for lazy bastards, which also like to
> write write-only code.
>  The query expressions extension is, well, no comment. Really, this is
> CSql,
> not C#.
>  I would really appreciate a slightly more powerful generics to all of the
> "extensions" above.
>  Cheers,
> Stoyan
>  P.S. Haven't had much sleep recently
>
> ===================================
> This list is hosted by DevelopMentorR  http://www.develop.com
>
> View archives and manage your subscription(s) at
> http://discuss.develop.com

===================================
This list is hosted by DevelopMentor®  http://www.develop.com

View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com