RE: Package organization - Why no top-level mo dule?

CMF and Plone, though, are also distributed this way. My thoughts as to why
this is good, at least in one way;
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2003-April/018175.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Kowalczyk [mailto:jtk-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 8:38 AM
> To: archetypes-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Archetypes-devel] Package organization - Why no top-level
> module?
> 
> 
> Archetypes is getting really interesting, I'm looking forward 
> to working
> with it in the coming months to do some of the things I 
> currently look to
> Formulator for.
> 
> One question though: shouldn't the entire Archetypes system 
> be arranged
> under a top-level module? APE adopted this approach as it 
> grew in scope.
> 
> It would seem to have benefits for ease of single-command CVS 
> checkout,
> single-command intallation, and reducing the number of 
> top-level modules
> Zope Products/ which aren't standalone products (maybe I'm
> misunderstanding the role of ArchGenXML, generator, validation and
> transform here). Doing a reorg after 1.0 and once products have been
> written to the current layout would be much more painful.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
> Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
> http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
> _______________________________________________
> Archetypes-devel mailing list
> Archetypes-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/archetypes-devel
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5