|
Package organization - Why no top-level module?: msg#00063web.zope.plone.archetypes.devel
Archetypes is getting really interesting, I'm looking forward to working with it in the coming months to do some of the things I currently look to Formulator for. One question though: shouldn't the entire Archetypes system be arranged under a top-level module? APE adopted this approach as it grew in scope. It would seem to have benefits for ease of single-command CVS checkout, single-command intallation, and reducing the number of top-level modules Zope Products/ which aren't standalone products (maybe I'm misunderstanding the role of ArchGenXML, generator, validation and transform here). Doing a reorg after 1.0 and once products have been written to the current layout would be much more painful. Thanks. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Security for objects: 00063, Morten W. Petersen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Package organization - Why no top-level mo dule?: 00063, sean . upton-lttx/tDbukJF6kxbq+BtvQ |
| Previous by Thread: | Security for objectsi: 00063, Morten W. Petersen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Package organization - Why no top-level module?: 00063, Benjamin Saller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |