|
Re: RE: [Plone-developers] Plone 1.1 - TODO: msg#00035web.zope.plone.archetypes.devel
Am Sonntag, 8. Juni 2003 19:54 schrieb sean.upton-lttx/tDbukJF6kxbq+BtvQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > I've posted this response over to archetypes-devel instead of > plone-developers. > > > References as they are done in the actual version are very > > weak (not more than > > 1000 objects with the same name, which breakes for index_html > > in the members > > folder) and do scale VERY poorly. > > I filed a bug for this. > > Robert > > I thought this was 10k not 1k for each object with the same zope id? > Still, it is a limit that might be an issue _IF_ you have a system where > there are likely to be a lot of items with the same id. Ideally, you try > to globally avoid the overlap of ids, but this obviously cannot be a > solution to index_html? > > The immediate fix for this is easy - just change the size of the random > number pool in _genId() to a larger number. This should not break backward > > compatibility with old uids, I think. For example: > >>> import time > >>> i = int((time.time() % 1.0) * 10000) > >>> i > > 8646 #won't be larger than 10k > > >>> i = int((time.time() % 1.0) * 1000000) > >>> i > > 528131 #won't be larger than 1Million Your rigth, It is 10000 not 10000. Neverthelesse I did run the following loop: x = {} while 1: x[int(time.time() % 10000)] = 1 after running five minutes on a moderately fast machine it had produced only 335 entries in the range from 7034 to 7438. I intended to batch create a couple of tousand users with each an index_html in their home folder. This is just not possible with the current implementation. > Another thought: Right now, I'm working on a patch to ReferenceEngine that > (a) replaces PersistentMapping with OOBTrees, (b) migrates existing > PersitentMapping reference attributes to OOBTrees to support upgrade, and > (c) adds methods for aggregate ref/bref querying (putting proper > names/labels on brefs via lookup table). For the future: In approaching > (a) I was thinking about how BTreeFolder2 does its UID generation: random > ISN and sequential IDs afterward. This is a bucket/thread affinity and > conflict-minimization mechanism, as it is likely that the ISN that each > thread/client picks will be in a different bucket than other threads > updating the btree and each thread tends to stay within its own btree. > This may be a YAGNI thing for references, but I suppose there could be a > high-write situation on a site where all content heavily use references and > there are high-frequency updates. This sounds very good Robert > Sean > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best > thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features > you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. > _______________________________________________ > Archetypes-devel mailing list > Archetypes-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/archetypes-devel -- mit freundlichen Grüssen Robert Rottermann www.redCOR.ch ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Plone-developers] Plone 1.1 - TODO: 00035, sean . upton-lttx/tDbukJF6kxbq+BtvQ |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Archetypes Installation error: 00035, grendelAI |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Plone-developers] Plone 1.1 - TODOi: 00035, sean . upton-lttx/tDbukJF6kxbq+BtvQ |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RE: [Plone-developers] Plone 1.1 - TODO: 00035, Seb Potter |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |